Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.retab.com/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

What are Experiments?

Experiments are controlled, block-level evaluations for workflow blocks. They run the same block with multiple consensus passes over the same set of documents and use agreement between those passes as the quality signal. Use experiments when you want to answer questions like:
  • Did this schema change make extraction fields more stable?
  • Which invoice documents are causing low agreement?
  • Which split category or classifier category is ambiguous?
  • Did a prompt, category, or split-definition change improve the block?
Experiments do not require ground-truth labels. They are consensus evals: Retab asks the block to produce several independent candidate outputs, compares those candidate outputs, and reports where the candidates agree or disagree. A higher score means stronger agreement. A low score points to an unstable document, field, category, subdocument type, or split-by-key partition.

Experiments vs Tests

Tests and experiments both help you keep workflow changes under control, but they answer different questions.
ToolBest forSignal
TestsChecking a specific expected outputPass, fail, or error against an assertion
ExperimentsMeasuring output stability across documentsConsensus score and disagreement details
Use a test when you know what the output should be. Use an experiment when you want to find weak spots, compare block configurations, or inspect whether a block is internally consistent before you write stricter assertions.

Supported Blocks

Experiments are currently supported for:
BlockWhat Retab measures
ExtractField-level agreement for extracted JSON values
SplitAgreement on subdocument/page assignments
ClassifierAgreement on routing category decisions
For EachKey-level agreement when the block is configured as split-by-key
Other workflow blocks can still be tested with workflow tests, but they do not currently produce experiment metrics.

How Experiments Work

An experiment is attached to one block in one workflow. It stores:
  1. The block under test - the workflow block id and block kind.
  2. A fixed document set - materialized block inputs captured from completed workflow runs or from files uploaded while creating the experiment.
  3. A consensus count - 3, 5, or 7 independent passes.
When you run the experiment, Retab freezes the current block configuration and replays the selected block for each document. Each document execution becomes an experiment job. The job stores the canonical artifact produced by the block:
BlockArtifact
ExtractExtraction
SplitSplit
ClassifierClassification
For Each split-by-keyPartition
Metrics are normalized across the same shape for every supported block:
document x target x voter
The target depends on the block type:
BlockTarget
ExtractField
SplitSubdocument
ClassifierCategory
For Each split-by-keyKey
This lets the dashboard show the same core views for different block types: overall summary, by-document scores, by-target scores, and voter-level disagreement.

Creating an Experiment

  1. Open a workflow in the dashboard.
  2. Go to Console -> Experiments.
  3. Click Experiment.
  4. Name the experiment.
  5. Choose the number of consensus passes: 3, 5, or 7.
  6. Select the block to evaluate.
  7. Select files from completed runs, or upload files for the experiment.
  8. Create the experiment.
When you create an experiment from the dashboard, Retab immediately starts computing metrics. The experiment page updates while the run is pending or running.

Reading Results

The experiment detail page has three sections:
SectionPurpose
ConfigReview or edit the block configuration being evaluated.
DataInspect per-document outputs and the underlying artifacts.
MetricsAnalyze consensus scores, weak targets, document-level failures, and voter disagreements.
The metrics views help you move from broad signal to specific evidence:
  • Summary shows the overall experiment score, target averages, document averages, and previous-run delta when available.
  • By document shows which files are least stable.
  • By target shows which fields, categories, subdocuments, or keys are least stable across the document set.
  • Votes shows the individual candidate outputs for one document-target cell, including the consensus value and disagreements.
Split and classifier experiments also expose specialized visualizations, such as confusion-style views, to make routing and page-assignment ambiguity easier to inspect.

Staleness and Re-runs

Experiment metrics belong to a specific block configuration and document set. If you edit the block or change the experiment documents, Retab marks the latest metrics as stale. If the output schema changes, Retab can also report schema drift. When an experiment is stale, run it again to refresh the score against the current workflow draft. Retab keeps run history, so you can compare the latest score with earlier runs and see whether a configuration change improved or degraded the block.
  1. Run the workflow with representative documents.
  2. Create an experiment for an Extract, Split, Classifier, or split-by-key For Each block.
  3. Start with 3 consensus passes while iterating quickly.
  4. Inspect the lowest-scoring documents and targets.
  5. Adjust the schema, prompt, categories, or split definitions.
  6. Re-run the experiment and compare the score with the previous run.
  7. Add workflow tests for outputs that should now be protected with explicit assertions.
Experiments work best as a discovery and comparison tool. They tell you where a block is uncertain; tests then lock in the behaviors you decide are correct.

Using the SDK

The dashboard flow above maps onto a small set of SDK calls. The same calls back the MCP tool surface, so anything you can do interactively or through an agent you can do programmatically.

Create an experiment

Pick a supported block, give the experiment a name and a document set, and choose how many consensus passes per document (3, 5, or 7). Documents come from prior workflow runs (via document_captures) or as explicit handle inputs.
python
from retab import Retab

client = Retab()

experiment = client.workflows.experiments.create(
    workflow_id="wf_abc123",
    block_id="extract-invoice",
    name="Q1 invoices",
    document_captures=[
        {"workflow_run_id": "wfrun_1"},
        {"workflow_run_id": "wfrun_2", "step_id": "for_each-0"},
    ],
    n_consensus=5,
)
go
// The Go SDK does not yet model the workflow experiments API. Call the
// /v1/workflows/{workflow_id}/experiments endpoints directly.
package main

import (
	"bytes"
	"encoding/json"
	"fmt"
	"io"
	"log"
	"net/http"
	"os"
)

func main() {
	body, err := json.Marshal(map[string]any{
		"block_id": "extract-invoice",
		"name":     "Q1 invoices",
		"document_captures": []map[string]any{
			{"workflow_run_id": "wfrun_1"},
			{"workflow_run_id": "wfrun_2", "step_id": "for_each-0"},
		},
		"n_consensus": 5,
	})
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}

	req, err := http.NewRequest(
		http.MethodPost,
		"https://api.retab.com/v1/workflows/wf_abc123/experiments",
		bytes.NewReader(body),
	)
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	req.Header.Set("Api-Key", os.Getenv("RETAB_API_KEY"))
	req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")

	resp, err := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	defer resp.Body.Close()

	payload, _ := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
	fmt.Println(string(payload))
}
Creating an experiment does NOT trigger a run — the document set is registered but no metrics exist yet.

Run the experiment

Trigger consensus runs against the current draft block config. This is async — the SDK returns a job_id and you poll for completion.
python
run = client.workflows.experiments.runs.create(
    workflow_id="wf_abc123",
    experiment_id=experiment.id,
)

# Block until the job finishes (or raises on failure / timeout).
client.jobs.wait_for_completion(run.job_id)
go
// Trigger an experiment run. Polling for the resulting job is left to the caller.
package main

import (
	"bytes"
	"fmt"
	"io"
	"log"
	"net/http"
	"os"
)

func main() {
	req, err := http.NewRequest(
		http.MethodPost,
		"https://api.retab.com/v1/workflows/wf_abc123/experiments/exp_abc123/run",
		bytes.NewReader([]byte("{}")),
	)
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	req.Header.Set("Api-Key", os.Getenv("RETAB_API_KEY"))
	req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")

	resp, err := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	defer resp.Body.Close()

	payload, _ := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
	fmt.Println(string(payload))
}
Pass n_consensus=... to override per-run, or retry_failed_only=True to re-run only the documents that errored in the previous run.

Read metrics

Metrics live behind one endpoint with four views — start at summary, drill into by_target on low-scoring fields, then into votes to see voter disagreement on a specific cell.
python
summary = client.workflows.experiments.get_metrics(
    workflow_id="wf_abc123",
    experiment_id=experiment.id,
    view="summary",
)

# A weak field surfaces in summary.aggregate.likelihoods → drill in
target_view = client.workflows.experiments.get_metrics(
    workflow_id="wf_abc123",
    experiment_id=experiment.id,
    view="by_target",
    target_path="line_items.*.unit_price",
)

# To see what each voter said for one document/target cell
votes = client.workflows.experiments.get_metrics(
    workflow_id="wf_abc123",
    experiment_id=experiment.id,
    view="votes",
    document_id="expdoc_xyz",
    target_path="line_items.*.unit_price",
)
go
package main

import (
	"fmt"
	"io"
	"log"
	"net/http"
	"net/url"
	"os"
)

func fetchMetrics(query url.Values) ([]byte, error) {
	endpoint := "https://api.retab.com/v1/workflows/wf_abc123/experiments/exp_abc123/metrics?" + query.Encode()
	req, err := http.NewRequest(http.MethodGet, endpoint, nil)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	req.Header.Set("Api-Key", os.Getenv("RETAB_API_KEY"))
	resp, err := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	defer resp.Body.Close()
	return io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
}

func main() {
	summary, err := fetchMetrics(url.Values{"view": {"summary"}})
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	fmt.Println(string(summary))

	// A weak field surfaces in summary.aggregate.likelihoods - drill in
	target, err := fetchMetrics(url.Values{
		"view":        {"by_target"},
		"target_path": {"line_items.*.unit_price"},
	})
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	fmt.Println(string(target))

	// To see what each voter said for one document/target cell
	votes, err := fetchMetrics(url.Values{
		"view":        {"votes"},
		"document_id": {"expdoc_xyz"},
		"target_path": {"line_items.*.unit_price"},
	})
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	fmt.Println(string(votes))
}
If the latest run is stale relative to the current block config or document set, get_metrics returns a stale_metrics error envelope — call runs.create(...) to recompute.

Update / delete / duplicate

python
# Change the document set or n_consensus — invalidates existing metrics
client.workflows.experiments.update(
    workflow_id="wf_abc123",
    experiment_id=experiment.id,
    n_consensus=7,
)

# Snapshot an experiment for a quick A/B against a config change
copy = client.workflows.experiments.duplicate(
    workflow_id="wf_abc123",
    experiment_id=experiment.id,
)

client.workflows.experiments.delete(
    workflow_id="wf_abc123",
    experiment_id=experiment.id,
)
go
package main

import (
	"bytes"
	"encoding/json"
	"fmt"
	"io"
	"log"
	"net/http"
	"os"
)

const base = "https://api.retab.com/v1/workflows/wf_abc123/experiments/exp_abc123"

func send(method, url string, body any) ([]byte, error) {
	var reader *bytes.Reader
	if body != nil {
		raw, err := json.Marshal(body)
		if err != nil {
			return nil, err
		}
		reader = bytes.NewReader(raw)
	} else {
		reader = bytes.NewReader(nil)
	}
	req, err := http.NewRequest(method, url, reader)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	req.Header.Set("Api-Key", os.Getenv("RETAB_API_KEY"))
	if body != nil {
		req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
	}
	resp, err := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}
	defer resp.Body.Close()
	return io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
}

func main() {
	// Change n_consensus - invalidates existing metrics
	updated, err := send(http.MethodPatch, base, map[string]any{"n_consensus": 7})
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	fmt.Println(string(updated))

	// Snapshot an experiment for a quick A/B against a config change
	copy, err := send(http.MethodPost, base+"/duplicate", map[string]any{})
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	fmt.Println(string(copy))

	// Delete the experiment
	if _, err := send(http.MethodDelete, base, nil); err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
}

Run every experiment on a block at once

Useful when you’ve changed a block config and want to refresh every experiment attached to it in one call.
python
result = client.workflows.experiments.run_batch(
    workflow_id="wf_abc123",
    block_id="extract-invoice",
)
print(f"Triggered {result.experiment_count} experiments")
go
package main

import (
	"bytes"
	"encoding/json"
	"fmt"
	"io"
	"log"
	"net/http"
	"os"
)

func main() {
	body, err := json.Marshal(map[string]any{"block_id": "extract-invoice"})
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}

	req, err := http.NewRequest(
		http.MethodPost,
		"https://api.retab.com/v1/workflows/wf_abc123/experiments/run-batch",
		bytes.NewReader(body),
	)
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	req.Header.Set("Api-Key", os.Getenv("RETAB_API_KEY"))
	req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")

	resp, err := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	defer resp.Body.Close()

	payload, _ := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
	fmt.Println(string(payload))
}
For the full method reference (including async variants under AsyncRetab.workflows.experiments), see the API reference.